The skills where humans beat AI.

Each skill measures an axis the models struggle to reproduce. Candidate scores are pitted against the latest versions of the public models, on the same challenges.

A résumé won’t tell you whether someone can infer a rule from three examples, stay sharp when the environment changes its rules, or read the real emotion behind a polite message. These are exactly the grounds where today’s AI models stumble — and therefore where a human still makes the difference. Our challenges measure these skills directly, through real scenarios, not a self-reported questionnaire.

6 skills available · 6 challenges in the catalog

Abstraction ability

A logic test where you infer a rule from just a few examples. Measure your ability to abstract complex rules.

1 test~15 min

Adapting to uncertainty

Test your strategic intuition in an unstable environment.

1 test~15 min

Emotional application

Faced with an emotional dilemma, pick the most fitting response — where there is no obvious right answer.

1 test~12 min

Emotional understanding

Identify the emotion truly felt and its real cause, beyond the surface signal.

1 test~14 min

Self-confidence

How confident are you in your own answers?

1 test~10 min
Coming soon

Sales negotiation

The candidate negotiates 5 successive purchases against an LLM seller, aiming to capture as much margin as possible while staying under budget.

1 test~20 min

How a skill is assessed

01

A challenge, not a questionnaire

Each skill is a concrete exercise: infer a hidden rule, negotiate five purchases against a seller model, pick the right reaction in a dilemma with no obvious answer. We observe what the candidate does, not what they claim they can do.

02

Benchmarked on a reference panel

Every challenge is calibrated against a panel of real profiles. A raw score means little on its own; set against that panel it becomes readable — “better than X% of candidates on this skill” rather than an abstract grade.

03

Pitted against AI models

The same challenges are run by the latest public models. The candidate sees where they stand, and above all where humans still hold the edge over the machine — which is the whole point of hiring for these skills.

Why these skills

Automation absorbs the repetitive, codifiable tasks. What gains value are the skills models reproduce poorly: abstraction from few examples, adaptation when the rules shift, fine emotional judgement, calibrated intuition under uncertainty. Assessing these axes means hiring for what will stay distinctly human tomorrow.